03 Şub Intercourse differences in mate preferences reviewed: Do anyone know what they very first appeal when you look at the an enchanting partner?
Eastwick, P.W., Finkel, Age. J., Mochon, D., Ariely, D. (2007). Choosy rather than unselective intimate notice: Not absolutely all reciprocity is generated equal. Psychological Research, 18, 317–319.
Fiore, A beneficial.T., Donath, J.S. (2005). Homophily inside online dating: Whenever do you really such as for example people such as yourself? Short Paper, ACM Desktop-People Communication 2005.
Fiore, An excellent T., Taylor, L S., Mendelsohn, Grams.An effective., Hearst, M. (2008). Examining attractiveness within the internet dating pages. Brief Paper, ACM Computer system-People Telecommunications 2008.
Fiore, An effective.T., Taylor, L.S., Zhong, X., Mendelsohn, G.A application de rencontre biraciale gratuite., Cheshire, C. (2010). Who has got best and you can who writes: Anybody, profiles, associations, and you may reactions in internet dating. In Proceedings out of Hawai'i All over the world Meeting on System Sciences, 43.
Lee, L., Loewenstein, G., Ariely, D., Hong, J., Young, J. (2008). If I am not sensuous, will you be sensuous or not? Physical-elegance recommendations and you can relationship choices while the a purpose of your individual elegance. Emotional Research, 19, 669-677.
Norton, Meters., Frost, J., Ariely, D. (2007). Faster is far more: Brand new entice out of ambiguity, or as to why familiarity types contempt. Log out of Personality and Personal Psychology, ninety-five, 97-105.
Sears-Roberts Alterovitz, S., Mendelsohn, G.An effective. (2009). Lover tastes across the life time: Internet dating of the older adults, Mindset and Aging, twenty four, 513-517.
What makes you simply click: An empirical analysis regarding matchmaking
Toma, C., Hancock, J., Ellison, N. (2008).
Para mas informacion 
